THE CAUCUS, NEW YORK TIMES BLOG April 14, 2008, 7:47 pm PITTSBURGH – It is no secret that Senator John McCain has never been a fan of the way President Bush and Congress added a new prescription drug benefit to Medicare a few years ago. He voted against the bill, raised alarms about its costs, and tried, in vain, to allow Americans to import lower-cost prescription drugs from Canada. Now Mr. McCain is planning to call for wealthier Medicare recipients to pay higher premiums in order to qualify for the prescription drug coverage, the McCain campaign’s top economic advisers said Monday evening. He is making the call for higher premiums as he is pushing for a series of cuts in corporate and other taxes. Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, plans to outline his proposal to change the Medicare drug benefit as part of a broad speech on the economy that he plans to deliver here on Tuesday. In the speech he will also say that as president he would try to impose a one-year freeze on all discretionary government spending – except in the military and for veterans’ benefits – while the government can conduct what his aides called a “top to bottom review” of federal spending. Mr. McCain signaled his frustration over the Medicare drug benefit last week during a campaign stop in Connecticut. “Now you are paying for my prescription drugs,’’ he said. “Why should that be? Why should that be? Why should that be?” A Q&A With McCain Adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin Douglas Holtz-Eakin is the director of economic policy for Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign. He's also a former director of the Congressional Budget Office. I recently caught up with Holtz-Eakin at McCain campaign headquarters and chatted with him a bit about taxes, the size of government, and energy policy. (To get his take on Clintonomics and the 1990s, see this.) Here are some excerpts: How would a President McCain make Social Security solvent?
We Do Not Have to Reduce the Rate of Growth of Social Security In an article on the cost of the Iraq War, the NYT presents a quote from James R. Horney, director of federal fiscal policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, asserting that, "we’re in a situation where we have to reduce spending and reduce the rate of growth of Medicare and Medicaid and, to a lesser extent, Social Security." The projections of rising health care costs in the United States imply that if the health care system is not fixed, Medicare and Medicaid will impose an enormous burden on the federal budget. However, the projected growth in Social Security system is relatively modest. Furthermore, the Congressional Budget Office projects the program to be fully funded by its designated taxes through the year 2046, with no changes whatsoever. The program can be fully funded through its 75-year planning horizon with tax increases that are no larger than were put in place in each of the decades from the 50s through the 80s. In his quote, Mr. Horney was expressing his own desire to see Social Security spending reduced, not reflecting the actual realities of the budget. This fact should have been made clear in the article. --Dean Baker The chairman of the Senate Finance Committee met with lobbyists for various physicians’ groups Friday to seek their support for a “modest” plan to stop an upcoming cut in Medicare payments to doctors. Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., said he is proposing to blocked the scheduled rate cuts for 18 months. He will try to go beyond that and provide a 1.1 percent boost in doctor payments if lawmakers can agree on a way to offset that cost, he told the group. Unless Congress acts in the next few weeks, a 10.6 percent payment cut will take effect in June, with deeper cuts to follow in 2009 and beyond. |